Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01409
Original file (BC 2014 01409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01409

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be 
corrected to reflect the award of the following Air Force Medals 
and/or Ribbons:

	a.  Air Force Overseas Ribbon – Short Tour (AFOR-S)

	b.  Air Force Overseas Ribbon – Long Tour (AFOR-L)


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served six months temporary duty and one year permanently 
stationed in Thailand which makes him eligible for both the 
AFOR-S and AFOR-L.

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his 
DD Form 214.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 23 Sep 
71.

On 22 Sep 75, the applicant was furnished an Honorable 
discharge, and was credited with 4 years of active service of 
which 1 year and 6 months were credited as Foreign Service.

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects award of the following Air 
Force Medals and/or Ribbons:

	- National Defense Service Medal
	- Vietnam Service Medal
	- Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal
	- Air Force Outstanding Unit Award
	- Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon
	- Air Force Longevity Service Award   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The AFOR was authorized by the Chief 
of Staff, United States Air Force, on 12 Oct 80.  The ribbon was 
authorized to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve 
members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 
1 Sep 80.  Only individuals serving on active duty as of 6 Jan 
86 are eligible to have the AFOR applied retroactively for 
completion of an overseas tour.  

After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military 
personnel record, they were unable to verify award of the AFOR-S 
or AFOR-L.  The applicant’s dates of service are several years 
before the authorization date for the award of the AFOR, 
rendering the applicant ineligible for award of these ribbons.

They were able to determine that the below Air Force Medal 
and/or Ribbon should have been awarded during the applicant’s 
service and are not reflected in his record:

	- Air Force Good Conduct Medal

Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of the 
applicant’s official military personnel record will be completed 
by AFPC/DPSOR.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 1 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
that relief beyond that already granted administratively is not 
warranted.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested 
relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01409 in Executive Session on 10 Mar 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01409 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 2 Jun 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 14.

						






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00460

    Original file (BC 2014 00460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for award of the AFCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. However, the date on the applicant’s letter of commendation falls outside of the dates when a letter of commendation could be converted to an AFCM; therefore, he is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01736

    Original file (BC 2014 01736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for award of the AFOR-ST, GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The AFOR-ST is awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. The GWOT-E is awarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04956

    Original file (BC-2012-04956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 Aug 69, SAF authorized the AFOEA to recognize the achievements and accomplishments of USAF organizations or activities. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the AFOEA, indicating they were unable to verify the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00547

    Original file (BC-2013-00547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the VSM, indicating the applicant was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for his service in Vietnam. The ribbon was authorized to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00547

    Original file (BC 2013 00547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the VSM, indicating the applicant was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for his service in Vietnam. The ribbon was authorized to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04680

    Original file (BC 2013 04680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, the applicant’s dates of service were well prior to the effective date of the AFOR and he is therefore not eligible. Instead, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00742

    Original file (BC 2014 00742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ADSM is awarded to all persons who served on active duty at any time between 8 Sep 39 and 7 Sec 41. DPSID states that they were unable to locate documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records verifying the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the AFCM or CRM, or that he served in a combat- ready position for 24 months to qualify for the CRM. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01354

    Original file (BC 2014 01354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01354 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon – Short Tour (AFOR-ST). The AFTR was established on 12 Oct 80, and is awarded to members who, after 14 Aug 74, complete an initial Air Force accession training program. Insufficient...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00545

    Original file (BC 2013 00545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They also recommend denial of the AFOR-ST, indicating the applicant separated from active duty several years before the AFOR was authorized; therefore he is not qualified for this award. The applicant provided travel orders for travel to Japan from APO 970, which DPSID verified as Korea dated 11 Mar 57, and a supply form dated 26 Jul 57, issuing him an M-1 Carbine; however, the travel voucher which authenticates the travel order and details exact dates and locations the applicant served...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01384

    Original file (BC 2014 01384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. As for his request for the AFOR-LT and AFTR, the applicant’s service dates are prior to the dates these awards were authorized. As for the applicant’s request to correct the DD Form 214 issued...